<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bandwidth Junkie&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.conall.net/2006/06/19/bandwidth-junkie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.conall.net/2006/06/19/bandwidth-junkie/</link>
	<description>A Glimpse Into Conall&#039;s Inner Thoughts...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 14:25:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: conall</title>
		<link>http://blog.conall.net/2006/06/19/bandwidth-junkie/comment-page-1/#comment-4478</link>
		<dc:creator>conall</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conall.net/archives/2006/06/19/bandwidth-junkie/#comment-4478</guid>
		<description>That is the original reason why I was considering the 30D, but comparing the specs between the two shows only a few key differences. Plus, I was able to play with a 350D last week and found it very nice to use.


With a few lenses, a 350D should be more than sufficient for my needs for quite a while. After that, I could always get a 30D body (when it&#039;s more reasonably priced) to use with the selection of lenses I&#039;ve acquired for a 350D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That is the original reason why I was considering the 30D, but comparing the specs between the two shows only a few key differences. Plus, I was able to play with a 350D last week and found it very nice to use.</p>
<p>With a few lenses, a 350D should be more than sufficient for my needs for quite a while. After that, I could always get a 30D body (when it&#8217;s more reasonably priced) to use with the selection of lenses I&#8217;ve acquired for a 350D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blog.conall.net/2006/06/19/bandwidth-junkie/comment-page-1/#comment-4477</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jun 2006 17:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.conall.net/archives/2006/06/19/bandwidth-junkie/#comment-4477</guid>
		<description>I am also considering a Digital-SLR, but won&#039;t be getting a 350D as it&#039;s just too basic. If I&#039;m spending that much I want to make sure I won&#039;t be forking out for a new one after a few months. For a little bit more (ok, maybe a good bit more) you can get the 30D, or 20D which is practically the same thing. Just make sure you get a decent lens with it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am also considering a Digital-SLR, but won&#8217;t be getting a 350D as it&#8217;s just too basic. If I&#8217;m spending that much I want to make sure I won&#8217;t be forking out for a new one after a few months. For a little bit more (ok, maybe a good bit more) you can get the 30D, or 20D which is practically the same thing. Just make sure you get a decent lens with it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
